- On 2023 január 22, vasárnap
- In eharmony-vs-okcupid sites
- Tags
The most famous bills () could be the Infidelity Troubles Questionnaire (IDQ; Buss et al
Regarding dimensions out-of personal jealousy, about 40 care about-declaration instruments was indeed reported due to the fact creation of new Thinking-Declaration and you will Projective Jealousy Bills (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Many devices were utilized only if. , 1992) created to evaluate intercourse differences; brand new Multidimensional Jealousy Scale (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) created to assess the around three proportions of jealousy (cognitive, mental and you may behavioural dimensions); brand new Twitter Jealousy Level (Muise, Christofides, & Des) intended for researching the likelihood of a conference that causes feelings out-of jealousy members associated with its hobby towards Fb; the latest Jealousy Level (Buunk, 1997), always see three style of envy (reactive, stressed and you will precautionary) while the Social Envy Level (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), hence evaluates the brand new negative emotion as a result of actual or endangered losses away from a loved person to a rival.
Into the Brazil, the fresh Romantic Jealousy List are changed (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) As for Colombia, there are no psychometric knowledge away from a certain size to your close jealousy
Regarding Latin american framework, there clearly was a version for the Chile of Inventory away from Behaviors of Few That can cause Jealousy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). For the Mexico, a good Multidimensional Measure of Envy (Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you will an initial analysis was through with new Multidimensional Directory regarding Close Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). In addition, previous education failed to manage Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) to corroborate the newest basis framework located, and reduced reliability accounts were included in the items (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise small samples were used (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).
The fresh IJS created to own Mathes and you may Severa (1981) is one of the most used balances to own evaluating romantic envy, it discover half dozen factors you to definitely gauge the sensitiveness so you’re able to risks associated to: (a) Partner’s cheating and 
The devices listed above have shown sufficient quantities of validity and you will accuracy
You’ll find four studies having examined in terms of their accuracy and you can authenticity. Mathes and you will Severa (1981) establish a few degree, in addition to basic research did the development of your size with 39 factors, which had been reduced so you can twenty-eight factors immediately after mathematical studies. After that, when you look at the the second data, IJS was used next to almost every other bills you to definitely analyzed close like-hyperlinks, insecurity, self-respect and a random questionnaire out of separate identities, guaranteeing, considering concept, the advanced of jealousy, the greater the level of Close love and the reduced new separate label of partners. Inside studies, i report a good coefficient of precision regarding .ninety-five to your overall scale. From inside the a third investigation, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and Cock (1982), so you’re able to increase the brand new evidence regarding validity, made use of the IJS and two behavioural procedures: (a) danger when met with a competition and you will (b) phrases from possessiveness toward spouse, as a consequence of a call which they built to the person who participated in the research. New asked correlations were acquired, which once more offered the latest validity of level. In the long run, from inside the a fourth data, Mathes, Roter and Joerger (1982) substantiated the newest convergent legitimacy of IJS with other scales that examined personal jealousy.